<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Critique of Rob Bell&#8217;s &#8220;The Gods Are Not Angry&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/</link>
	<description>reflections on God's amazing grace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bell’s “Nooma 019 Open” &#8211; (Review) : ReturningKing.Com</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bell’s “Nooma 019 Open” &#8211; (Review) : ReturningKing.Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>[...] teaches contrary to the substitutionary atonement of Christ.  I have heard him decry that “God is not angry” for man’s sin.  I have read his works which come exceptionally close to preaching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] teaches contrary to the substitutionary atonement of Christ.  I have heard him decry that “God is not angry” for man’s sin.  I have read his works which come exceptionally close to preaching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2971</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 18:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2971</guid>
		<description>Daiv:

No, there is definite precision in God&#039;s Word.  

Sorry if I came across as strident.   I was just giving my perspective on grace being the way to Heaven, not works.

Thanks,
Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daiv:</p>
<p>No, there is definite precision in God&#8217;s Word.  </p>
<p>Sorry if I came across as strident.   I was just giving my perspective on grace being the way to Heaven, not works.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>Hi Randy,

Happy New Year!

Are you saying that there is no precision in the Word of God?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy,</p>
<p>Happy New Year!</p>
<p>Are you saying that there is no precision in the Word of God?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>Daiv:

I had to out-right contradict another post, but when I read your comment, I felt compelled.

Here&#039;s your quote:
&quot;1. You must have the exact gospel and exact response to avoid hell.&quot;

From my perspective, this seems like a prescriptive and legalistic interpretation.  In fact, it seems flat out wrong since it is only through the grace of God and the sacrifice of Christ that we are forgiven (and given eternal life) and not through exact adherence to the gospel or through any action of our own.  
  
The Bible is full of folks who failed to live up to the criteria you set forth and we all fail to meet those standards.  Heaven would be a very empty place if that were the case.

Again, sorry to be so blunt, but I felt like I had to say something.  

God bless,
Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daiv:</p>
<p>I had to out-right contradict another post, but when I read your comment, I felt compelled.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s your quote:<br />
&#8220;1. You must have the exact gospel and exact response to avoid hell.&#8221;</p>
<p>From my perspective, this seems like a prescriptive and legalistic interpretation.  In fact, it seems flat out wrong since it is only through the grace of God and the sacrifice of Christ that we are forgiven (and given eternal life) and not through exact adherence to the gospel or through any action of our own.  </p>
<p>The Bible is full of folks who failed to live up to the criteria you set forth and we all fail to meet those standards.  Heaven would be a very empty place if that were the case.</p>
<p>Again, sorry to be so blunt, but I felt like I had to say something.  </p>
<p>God bless,<br />
Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>Daiv,

Thanks for the post. Most have been vitriolic and for the first time a few days ago I had to delete a comment by someone who leads worship at a church but whose comments were full of hatred and a few cuss words, to boot. You&#039;re spot on. The cart has been out before the horse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daiv,</p>
<p>Thanks for the post. Most have been vitriolic and for the first time a few days ago I had to delete a comment by someone who leads worship at a church but whose comments were full of hatred and a few cuss words, to boot. You&#8217;re spot on. The cart has been out before the horse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daiv</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2913</link>
		<dc:creator>Daiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2913</guid>
		<description>Matt - do you have one of those &quot;COEXIST&quot; bumper stickers on your car? Truth is what corresponds with reality. Catholics, mormons, evengelicals, evolutionists, muslims, etc. can&#039;t all be right.

Everyone, the reason we must be critical and Rob Bell must be more consistent and careful is because the Bible is crystal clear that 1. You must have the exact gospel and exact response to avoid hell. 2. A lot of people are going to get it &#039;kind of&#039; right and get the shock of their lives. Consider this most frightening text of all the Bible: Matthew 7:21-23 &quot;Not everyone who says to me, &#039;Lord, Lord,&#039; will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, &#039;Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?&#039; Then I will tell them plainly, &#039;I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!&#039;

And just before that Jesus says &quot;Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.&quot;

Also in Gal. 1 - Paul says twice in a row that anyone who preaches a &quot;different gospel&quot; should be &quot;eternally condemned&quot;. If Paul was such a hard-liner on the Gospel/theology/doctrine, don&#039;t you think we should be too?

The Gospel is not &quot;Love one another&quot;! Loving one another is the necessary result of those who correctly responded to the Gospel. See 1 John 3:14. Look at the scripture, it is clear, Dead People (Eph 2.) don&#039;t love - they must be made alive first and then they love. You&#039;ve got the cart before the horse.

Finally, regarding those multiple interpretations of the Bible - Matt, after reading your comments, I&#039;m glad you fully agree with the Blog ownner&#039;s Critique. At least that is the way that I interperate your posts. After all, if we can interperet the Bible 1000 different ways, can&#039;t we also interperet your post 1000 ways? Or when you write, do you actually mean what you say and expect us to take it at face value? Why then should we not also take what God says at face value?

(Sorry, I know I&#039;m a little off topic here, but Rob Bell is either right or wrong. He isn&#039;t automatically right simply because we WANT everyone to be right. To cry &quot;Can&#039;t we all just get along?&quot; ... the answer is &quot;No!&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; do you have one of those &#8220;COEXIST&#8221; bumper stickers on your car? Truth is what corresponds with reality. Catholics, mormons, evengelicals, evolutionists, muslims, etc. can&#8217;t all be right.</p>
<p>Everyone, the reason we must be critical and Rob Bell must be more consistent and careful is because the Bible is crystal clear that 1. You must have the exact gospel and exact response to avoid hell. 2. A lot of people are going to get it &#8216;kind of&#8217; right and get the shock of their lives. Consider this most frightening text of all the Bible: Matthew 7:21-23 &#8220;Not everyone who says to me, &#8216;Lord, Lord,&#8217; will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, &#8216;Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?&#8217; Then I will tell them plainly, &#8216;I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!&#8217;</p>
<p>And just before that Jesus says &#8220;Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also in Gal. 1 &#8211; Paul says twice in a row that anyone who preaches a &#8220;different gospel&#8221; should be &#8220;eternally condemned&#8221;. If Paul was such a hard-liner on the Gospel/theology/doctrine, don&#8217;t you think we should be too?</p>
<p>The Gospel is not &#8220;Love one another&#8221;! Loving one another is the necessary result of those who correctly responded to the Gospel. See 1 John 3:14. Look at the scripture, it is clear, Dead People (Eph 2.) don&#8217;t love &#8211; they must be made alive first and then they love. You&#8217;ve got the cart before the horse.</p>
<p>Finally, regarding those multiple interpretations of the Bible &#8211; Matt, after reading your comments, I&#8217;m glad you fully agree with the Blog ownner&#8217;s Critique. At least that is the way that I interperate your posts. After all, if we can interperet the Bible 1000 different ways, can&#8217;t we also interperet your post 1000 ways? Or when you write, do you actually mean what you say and expect us to take it at face value? Why then should we not also take what God says at face value?</p>
<p>(Sorry, I know I&#8217;m a little off topic here, but Rob Bell is either right or wrong. He isn&#8217;t automatically right simply because we WANT everyone to be right. To cry &#8220;Can&#8217;t we all just get along?&#8221; &#8230; the answer is &#8220;No!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roford</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>Roford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>Dude I don&#039;t know what night you saw on the tour but what you heard and what I heard is incredibly different at certain points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude I don&#8217;t know what night you saw on the tour but what you heard and what I heard is incredibly different at certain points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshuasbuenaventura@yahoo.com</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2892</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshuasbuenaventura@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 11:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2892</guid>
		<description>I would just like to thank everyone for sharing their point of view. Its nice to have read how people respond to one of the leaders of the emerging church. I agree with that reading this may have caused me time but for sure it was helpful. as iron sharpens another... i am touched by Bell&#039;s messages and it has prompted me to draw closer to God and see him in a different light. and in doing so i learn some more. i guess my point is we can argue and debate about things or we can chose to grow in the faith and lead others to Christ. Isnt that the whole point? again for those who initiated this blog and those that shared their opinion i thank you. when we are all finally in heaven and we see the grand design of God which we are all part of, i bet we will laugh and cry for while were doing (or some people) the nitty gritty of our reading and delivery of the word to this dying generation people are dying and getting more and more lost. 

again thanks for inspiring me guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would just like to thank everyone for sharing their point of view. Its nice to have read how people respond to one of the leaders of the emerging church. I agree with that reading this may have caused me time but for sure it was helpful. as iron sharpens another&#8230; i am touched by Bell&#8217;s messages and it has prompted me to draw closer to God and see him in a different light. and in doing so i learn some more. i guess my point is we can argue and debate about things or we can chose to grow in the faith and lead others to Christ. Isnt that the whole point? again for those who initiated this blog and those that shared their opinion i thank you. when we are all finally in heaven and we see the grand design of God which we are all part of, i bet we will laugh and cry for while were doing (or some people) the nitty gritty of our reading and delivery of the word to this dying generation people are dying and getting more and more lost. </p>
<p>again thanks for inspiring me guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2872</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2872</guid>
		<description>Bell is no heretic by any orthodox view of scripture.  Go to his church&#039;s website (Mars Hill in Grand Rapids) to see what the doctrine is that he believes and teaches.  There is no doubt that he makes clear that Jesus is the only way to salvation and that we must individually trust Jesus as savior.  Most of the criticism I have seen is from those in the reformed theology camp, who generally have a dim view of most other Christians who do not subscribe to reformed theology.  Personally, I am quite comfortable that God will accept into heaven the person who desires to love and follow Jesus, obeys His commands to love God and love others, but has no idea what the concept of substitutionary atonement is.  The problem with modern American Christianity is that we have turned it into a &quot;knowledge game&quot; much like the pharisees that were so quickly condemned by Jesus.  Yes, only Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.  Yes, we must die to ourselves and follow him.  Yes, that means we are to love God and love others.  Scripture tells us what love is, in 1 Corinthians 13.  Yes, any basis for belief that is not grounded on Jesus Christ is a path to destruction.  But, to say that I must understand the essence of &quot;blood&quot; and concepts of atonement to be a believer is quite silly.  If we applied the standard many use to judge Rob Bell, we would likely conclude that the Apostle Paul was not a Christian.  In some of his letters in the Bible, he didn&#039;t lay out the whole gospel and he made some statements that could lead one to believe he was a universalist.  My goodness, he didn&#039;t talk about Christ&#039;s blood in all of his letters either.  But, because we have the whole of his work before us, we know he was orthodox and led by God in his writings.  Although I cannot say that Rob Bell is &quot;led by God&quot; like Paul was, if we look at the whole body of his work as we would with Paul, we see that he is very orthodox in his beliefs.  So, let us focus on actual destructive heresy that is being taught, and not the things we think are missing or implied in someone&#039;s words.  As the saying goes, if you &quot;assume&quot; what someone is saying . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bell is no heretic by any orthodox view of scripture.  Go to his church&#8217;s website (Mars Hill in Grand Rapids) to see what the doctrine is that he believes and teaches.  There is no doubt that he makes clear that Jesus is the only way to salvation and that we must individually trust Jesus as savior.  Most of the criticism I have seen is from those in the reformed theology camp, who generally have a dim view of most other Christians who do not subscribe to reformed theology.  Personally, I am quite comfortable that God will accept into heaven the person who desires to love and follow Jesus, obeys His commands to love God and love others, but has no idea what the concept of substitutionary atonement is.  The problem with modern American Christianity is that we have turned it into a &#8220;knowledge game&#8221; much like the pharisees that were so quickly condemned by Jesus.  Yes, only Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life.  Yes, we must die to ourselves and follow him.  Yes, that means we are to love God and love others.  Scripture tells us what love is, in 1 Corinthians 13.  Yes, any basis for belief that is not grounded on Jesus Christ is a path to destruction.  But, to say that I must understand the essence of &#8220;blood&#8221; and concepts of atonement to be a believer is quite silly.  If we applied the standard many use to judge Rob Bell, we would likely conclude that the Apostle Paul was not a Christian.  In some of his letters in the Bible, he didn&#8217;t lay out the whole gospel and he made some statements that could lead one to believe he was a universalist.  My goodness, he didn&#8217;t talk about Christ&#8217;s blood in all of his letters either.  But, because we have the whole of his work before us, we know he was orthodox and led by God in his writings.  Although I cannot say that Rob Bell is &#8220;led by God&#8221; like Paul was, if we look at the whole body of his work as we would with Paul, we see that he is very orthodox in his beliefs.  So, let us focus on actual destructive heresy that is being taught, and not the things we think are missing or implied in someone&#8217;s words.  As the saying goes, if you &#8220;assume&#8221; what someone is saying . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charsoo</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>charsoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>Universalism, I don&#039;t think so.  I read a pharisaical viewpoint of a imperfect man doing his best to show the real Jesus as the scriptures express.  The questions he ask do not dog the unbeliever with judgement and finger pointing, of which we are called not to do: 1 Corinthians 5:9-13: 

     I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people—not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. &quot;Expel the wicked man from among you.&quot;

I hear a man whom Yeshua Ha&#039;Mashiac has redeemed and continues to redeem every moment of everyday...

This man wants those lost in the wilderness to know there is someone who wants to help them find their way and Yeshua has sent them to lead them home.

It must start with love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universalism, I don&#8217;t think so.  I read a pharisaical viewpoint of a imperfect man doing his best to show the real Jesus as the scriptures express.  The questions he ask do not dog the unbeliever with judgement and finger pointing, of which we are called not to do: 1 Corinthians 5:9-13: </p>
<p>     I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people—not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat. What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. &#8220;Expel the wicked man from among you.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hear a man whom Yeshua Ha&#8217;Mashiac has redeemed and continues to redeem every moment of everyday&#8230;</p>
<p>This man wants those lost in the wilderness to know there is someone who wants to help them find their way and Yeshua has sent them to lead them home.</p>
<p>It must start with love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2863</guid>
		<description>I understand the concerns around Rob Bell. But I no longer worry that he is off the mark. He challenges us for sure and I&#039;d argue that is more than happy that he sparks people to get out their Bible&#039;s and wrestle with some of the stuff he says. 

When I first started reading his work I had some questions arise but the more I read, the more I undertood that he is very much on the ball scripturally and theologically. I guess some folks have to have &quot;in the name of Jesus&quot; after every statement someone makes or else they are suspect. But I don;t know how many more ways Mr. Bell can confirm that he is a man who lives by Orthodox Christianity, The Nicene Creed, or however you want to say that he has the essentials covered. Over and over again in the Beliefnet article linked in an above reply he talks about The Risen Christ, the resurrected Christ, etc. 

Faith, Hope and Love...He&#039;s got them covered. 

Is his theology always 100% correct and without error? Nope...Neither is yours. Neither is mine. Neither is Billy Graham&#039;s. 

As for universalism, my guess is if Rob walked into a Universalist church and tried to teach he would be thrown out for being a Christian. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the concerns around Rob Bell. But I no longer worry that he is off the mark. He challenges us for sure and I&#8217;d argue that is more than happy that he sparks people to get out their Bible&#8217;s and wrestle with some of the stuff he says. </p>
<p>When I first started reading his work I had some questions arise but the more I read, the more I undertood that he is very much on the ball scripturally and theologically. I guess some folks have to have &#8220;in the name of Jesus&#8221; after every statement someone makes or else they are suspect. But I don;t know how many more ways Mr. Bell can confirm that he is a man who lives by Orthodox Christianity, The Nicene Creed, or however you want to say that he has the essentials covered. Over and over again in the Beliefnet article linked in an above reply he talks about The Risen Christ, the resurrected Christ, etc. </p>
<p>Faith, Hope and Love&#8230;He&#8217;s got them covered. </p>
<p>Is his theology always 100% correct and without error? Nope&#8230;Neither is yours. Neither is mine. Neither is Billy Graham&#8217;s. </p>
<p>As for universalism, my guess is if Rob walked into a Universalist church and tried to teach he would be thrown out for being a Christian. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bell: The Gods Aren&#8217;t Angry DVD &#171; amazing grey city</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bell: The Gods Aren&#8217;t Angry DVD &#171; amazing grey city</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2847</guid>
		<description>[...] of the heated discussions around here concerning Bell&#8217;s theology {see the posts here and here}, I thought I&#8217;d point out that the DVD from his tour &#8220;The Gods Aren&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the heated discussions around here concerning Bell&#8217;s theology {see the posts here and here}, I thought I&#8217;d point out that the DVD from his tour &#8220;The Gods Aren&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbi</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2845</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2845</guid>
		<description>Uh...yes it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230;yes it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeyspiegel</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2844</link>
		<dc:creator>joeyspiegel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 19:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2844</guid>
		<description>Substitutionary atonement is not necessary to be orthodox and does not equal universalism.  I encourage you to look up theories of atonement like Christus Victor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Substitutionary atonement is not necessary to be orthodox and does not equal universalism.  I encourage you to look up theories of atonement like Christus Victor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tay</title>
		<link>http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amazinggreycity.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/a-critique-of-rob-bells-the-gods-are-not-angry/#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>in addtion - in Bell&#039;s Easter sermon a few weeks ago he STONGLY AFFIRMS the physcial ressurection of Jesus Christ. STRONGLY AND BEAUTIFULLY - one of the greatest messages i&#039;ve heard. Listen to the ENTIRE thing...please. Bell is NO heretic.

Bell and many others (NT WRIGHT, Dallas Willard...) are helping reclaim some of historic orthodox christianity that has been lost in the modern american evangelical/reform church. RECLAIM THEOLOGY 

- substituionary atonement is not he only biblical view of the atonement - in fact it is not the orginal view.

peace to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in addtion &#8211; in Bell&#8217;s Easter sermon a few weeks ago he STONGLY AFFIRMS the physcial ressurection of Jesus Christ. STRONGLY AND BEAUTIFULLY &#8211; one of the greatest messages i&#8217;ve heard. Listen to the ENTIRE thing&#8230;please. Bell is NO heretic.</p>
<p>Bell and many others (NT WRIGHT, Dallas Willard&#8230;) are helping reclaim some of historic orthodox christianity that has been lost in the modern american evangelical/reform church. RECLAIM THEOLOGY </p>
<p>- substituionary atonement is not he only biblical view of the atonement &#8211; in fact it is not the orginal view.</p>
<p>peace to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
